* James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-13 09:36]: > Stephen Hahn writes: > > The current approach is that projects seek sponsoring Community > > Groups, and that project leads will become Contributors or Core > > Contributors in the sponsoring Community Group. > > That doesn't happen, though.
Not yet, no: my first excuse is that we're in the bootstrap phase of the process. But even during the bootstrap, people have recourse to the Board. I suppose the priority that I am operating with (divined from the Board, I think) is that we need an elected Board with a clearer mandate to make changes. First on that set of changes (I hope) is some reeducation of what it means to have a Community Group--it's not just a set of web pages and an alias, but a responsibility to act as the embassy for a set of technical or social interests to the larger Community. That is, it's work, which I don't think was made clear during the earlier phases of the effort. (But in all of the current development process, the onus is on the individual or group suggesting change... so we're at least consistent. :) ) - Stephen -- Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/ _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
