On 2/14/07, Adam Leventhal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey Joe,
That sounds like a great idea especially for people who are planning on
deploying Solaris Nevada or building software solutions out of it. Would
it be sufficient to have, say, two builds of stabilitzation every 3 months
or so?
If its every three months, I would sort of want a good solid two or
three weeks of stabilization. However, personally I feel something
closer to every two months. But yes, once per quarter seems to gel
with peoples calendars.
Adam
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 11:15:56PM -0800, Joe Little wrote:
> The recent fix-only release of B54 and B55 were a breath of fresh air.
> We utilize OpenSolaris builds in one fashion or another in production
> both at Stanford in my role there as well as where I consult for use
> in file servers. Again, I look upon recent features, fixes, and I'd
> like to jump to newer releases. However, at the same time I see a lot
> of churn and potentially unstable putbacks that just need a bit more
> time to flesh out.
>
> It would be great if OpenSolaris as a whole went through regular
> stabilization builds or otherwise followed a scheme whereby those in
> production or quasi-production modes may feel safe in adopting series
> of builds most likely not to give them unwanted headaches and also
> improve upon previous builds in their infrastructure.
> _______________________________________________
> opensolaris-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
--
Adam Leventhal, Solaris Kernel Development http://blogs.sun.com/ahl
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
