Rich Teer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote:
>
> > So the /usr/gnu proposal[1] was approved by PSARC. Obviously, the
> > reason for defining /usr/gnu wasn't theoretical -- it allows moving
> > GNU packages from /usr/sfw to /usr or /usr/gnu and it helps us
>
> I'm nor sure I see the point of exchanging /usr/foo for /usr/bar.
> I mean what problem will /usr/gnu solve that /usr/sfw doesn't?
> And doesn't that name preclude open source software that doesn't
> use a GNU license?
You are asking the same I did some weeks before.
It seems that there is a will to rename the tree.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
