> I think the project is trying to navigate from a "share nothing > publically" position (that might be, say, conceived by a lawyer) to > an "open development" position. So you are seeing an attempt to > interpret legal restrictions.
Yes. :) > It might be more helpful if there was more than one repository, so > that there was a clearly open repository to which code moved to (out > of an anonymous repository) as it becomes ready. For that public > repository, there should very clearly be a public list. I can > understand a project team wanting to have a "no anonymous" repository > for the early stages of development, when legal restrictions (such as > patent processes, for instance) are in force, or when some component > is only available in pre-production form. For these latter cases, it > would be good to discuss how a non-Sun, not-Intel community member > could participate (via NDA, waiver, other methods), if known. > > It would also be helpful to identify what technology/device/platform > the open development portion is trying to cover (with links into the > vast Intel website, maybe). onnv-intel is now opened for anonymous pull. We will start documenting in more detail what the open development portion will cover. In general, work on all released Intel products will be conducted in the open. intel-platform-dev is *not* a closed alias, but we would like to keep the traffic coding related. Thanks everybody for your interest and support. We look forward to your contribution. Sherry -- Sherry Moore, Solaris Kernel Development http://blogs.sun.com/sherrym _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
