Because int this case it would be probably closed as a duplicate of this
solved problem. If you think that's an incorrect procedure, I'll file a
new CR and can cite you in the comments, in case the bug gets closed as
a duplicate.
James Carlson napsal(a):
Alexander Kuzmin writes:
No, that's exactly the issue seen 12 years ago. I've opened an MR for a
different Solaris release - that's the correct procedure that ensures
that the bug history on the original release can be easily followed.
I strongly disagree. The problem was fixed. We should *not* end up
with two instances of a "fix" for the same CR number in the SCCS
history -- that's just plain broken.
Others have commented on that new MR saying that it shouldn't have
been opened. Why won't you open a new CR?
Alexander Kuzmin
--
______
/_____/\ Alexander Kuzmin
/____ \\ \ Software Engineer
/_____\ \\ / Prague Globalization
/_____/ \/ / /
/_____/ / \//\ Sun Microsystems Czech, s.r.o.
\_____\//\ / / V Parku 2308/8
\_____/ / /\ / 148 00 Praha 4 - Chodov
\_____/ \\ \
\_____\ \\ Phone: +420 233 009 426 (x49426)
\_____\/ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
