Geez, Redhat, Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, Centos must all
be doing the wrong thing then deploying updates to
their thousands of users whether they are individual
desktops or people who keep their own local repository
for their servers.

With the exception of RedHat, those are all developer distros aimed at casual hackers and small firms and desktop users, not professional developers or production environments.

What seems to be the cause of confusion here is the fact that you expect the Linux update model to work for OpenSolaris. It does not work for OpenSolaris, because OpenSolaris has a completely different development model. It does what you want, but in a completely different way. But what's it to you if the end result is the same?

Why are people with Linux background constantly complaining about OpenSolaris not fitting square pegs into round holes? Why is the Linux way "one size fits all" shoe?

I read about "ease of use" phrases being flung around here like there's no tomorrow.

I feel compelled to ask, hey, am I communicating with desktop users and amateurs here who just want a Windows-like "clicky-bunty" system, or IT / CS professionals??? Even if I am communicating with developers, I still have to ask, how is someone going to be able to develop a good, quality product if they don't really know the system they're developing for in depth?

_________________________________________________________________
Mortgage refinance is Hot. *Terms. Get a 5.375%* fix rate. Check savings https://www2.nextag.com/goto.jsp?product=100000035&url=%2fst.jsp&tm=y&search=mortgage_text_links_88_h2bbb&disc=y&vers=925&s=4056&p=5117

_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to