chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you like a useful discussion please keep lines <= 79 characters.
> I seem to have not been as clear as I should have. I sugest Nero not because
> there is no other alternative but because it is simple better. from and end
> user rospective it is highly intuative, can do anything you could posibly
> want, has every cd or dvd feature out there, and has a more powerfull (yes
> this is true go through the technical documentation if you must) engine then
> cdrecord. if we wantt o bring Solaris to the masses we need tools that the
> masses can use. if i put nero infront of my grandma (and i have infact done
> this) and told where that she could scroll ove rteh buttons and it would tel
> her what they wre she could use it (she picked it up in less then 5 min). if
> i put cdrecord (even with a decent UI) it would confuse her. Graveman and
> others are good but not as good, most of the UI's are still feature
> incomplete, while Nero is a full package and all very closely knit.
There is xcdroast which is easy to use.
If you miss a feature with cdrecord, please go ahead and tell me.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
