On 5/2/07, Richard L. Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've got a couple of sparcs (more actually, but two that run without difficulty): a Sun Blade 2000 running 5.11 snv_41, and a Sun Blade 100 running 5.9 Generic_122300-04; both have access to Studio 10 and Studio 11, as well as full development environments and a fair bit of blastwave stuff loaded. If you have stuff you want me to compile, run, and email the output back, let me know. I _don't_ have tons of disk space, nor any interest in reloading either system to something newer on anything other than my own schedule. (which is to say, I may reload the 2000 to snv_62 or later, whatever is cool and stable enough, provided I have a big chunk of time sometime to get it just how I like it, and space to move stuff uniquely on there off to) Consider it an opportunity for some backwards-compatibility testing. :-) There's also plenty of info at http://www.sparc.org/resource.htm and newer stuff (T1 chip) at http://opensparc-t1.sunsource.net/index.html and a couple items about the Fujitsu SPARC64 V near the bottom of http://www.fujitsu.com/global/support/computing/server/unix/documents/ (I don't do assembler if I can help it, but I can scrounge the web pretty well...) This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
I _think_ that simply interposing the what I've written via LD_PRELOAD should work 'i.e. 'LD_PRELOAD=mylibdisasm.so /usr/ccs/bin/dis program_name'. If so, all it should require is a non-privileged account. I suspect CPU time is going to be the bigger requirement than disk space. Unless major work has happened to the sparc assembler, I think any version of nevada where libdisasm.so exists should work (though perhaps people more knowledgable in this area could comment).
_______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
