> The opposite could be said about Solaris. A) Solaris > has an > illustrious history of adopting useless standards,
You've never truly lived until you've been dumped in a middle of a salad of all kinds of Linux distros - from RedHat 9 to SuSE 9 to RHES to RHEL to ... Then you'll know what pains and nightmares look like during waking hours. And you'll wish you could take what you wrote above back - about 1000 times over. > and b) solaris has > an illustrious history of not meeting a needs if > there is any conflict > with a standard. How about some facts? Which conflicting standards does or did Solaris implement? > > IMHO - Solaris is not Linux, nor should it ever be. > > This we agree on. We all do - the day Solaris becomes Linux is the day I quit working with computers. This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
