Doug Scott wrote:
Steven Sim wrote:
BASH also occupies more memory. But to each his or her own. I have
nothing against people using BASH. I just don't recommend it as a
root shell.
Steve where do you get your figure here? I am curious in your
benchmarks. Why does bash use more memory than sh?
Doug
Sorry, I probably should have added that so far in my testing bash has
been significantly faster at executing many different shell scripts than
sh. I would be curious to know where this is not the case. Maybe some
tuning is needed.
Doug
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
