> UNIX admin wrote:
> 
> Other people have addressed the other issues you
> raised, I'll address 
> this one:
> 
> > I'm thinking that Java failed to deliver on the
> promise of "write
> > once, run anywhere". Java programs developed on
>  Windows do not, up to
> > this present day, work on Solaris;
> 
> That is incorrect. I've been working on a GUI app
> that runs unchanged on 
> both Windows *and* Solaris, and uses the native L&F
> on *both* platforms 
> with *no* code changes.

Don't you worry one bit - there's pah-lenty of Java stuff out there that 
doesn't work WITHOUT code changes.

> 
> > it's a revision dependency hell - for example,
>  Java 1.6.whatever broke
> > Azaureus; Legato NetWorker front end busts with
> Java 1.5.0 even though
> > it says it should work and "to ignore the
>  warning".
> Azureus?  Do you mean 
> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=655
> 0813?  How is a 
> bug in some external Windows DLL Java's fault?

"We encountered an unexpected error. Please try back again."

Powered by Java Server Pages, perhaps? Yeah, that's what I'm talking about.
It's a shame the thing has spread like a virus on millions of devices over the 
past ten years.

As for Azureus, all I know, as an end user, that one day a nice baloon popped 
up telling me to upgrade Java, which I did. After that, Azureus mysteriosly 
stopped working. It wasn't until I explicitly uninstalled the "latest and 
greatest" Java "upgrade" and explicitly installed 1.4.x that the thing started 
working again.

Now I don't care what caused it. All I care, as a dumb Windows user in that 
moment, that when the latest and "greatest" Java comes onto the system, my app 
stops working. Nice.

> And as for Legato, both our internal bug database and
> Gogle draw a 
> blank, do you have any more details?

What do you need? Screenshots? Null pointer Exceptions? Explicitly pointing 
/usr/java to JDK 1.4.2 fixes the "problem", and NetWorker GUI fires up.

But anyway, be that as it may, I better shut up, I've got to watch my blood 
pressure.
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to