> I assumed that those projects were proposed before we > approved the new > process. Certainly any project being proposed today > should not be > using the old process; even without the tweaks we're > contemplating to > OGB/2007/001 (which I hope we'll approve at next > week's meeting), it's > much better than what we had before and I see no > reason not to use it. >
Maybe you should change the wording on the projects page, before you start using OGB/2007/001. This page describes what the community is supposed to do to propose a new project. Until this wording is changed, I do not see why any project proposal should follow any other format. Doug Current procedure from the projects page - "The process for requesting a new project requires that a community member write a proposal to the opensolaris-discuss list and at least one other community member agree with the proposal. If the proposal doesn't garner a seconder within 30 days, it will be considered void. The process is intentionally lightweight because we expect that the bulk of new collaborative efforts will be projects with many growing into full communities comprised of one or more projects." This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
