>On 11/06/07, Dev Mazumdar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> After much deliberation - we're going with CDDL for BSD. I don't know why >> OpenBSD can't work wit h CDDL since FreeBSD and NetBSD can. >> > >The only complaint I've ever seen is about header files not being able >to be included by default in the kernel and then have the binary >result distributed and not be CDDL. But that wasn't OpenBSD >specifically. Its the same complaint being made by BSD folks w/ >DTrace.
The binaries are never "under the CDDL"; they are under whatever binary license you have; the source is under the CDDL. I thought it was largely political "the core must be bure BSD licensed" or some such. Casper _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
