On 14/06/07, Criveti Mihai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hence my previous point. It should be made available under a clear and simple to understand license. Not 2 or 3 or exceptions in FAQ... GPL, but not for FreeBSD. You can't impose such restrictions in a FAQ but provide a license that says otherwise, it's not legally binding (or productive for that matter). It can't be GPL but not for FreeBSD. You have a different license and HAVE to put that in the license.
I think you're misunderstanding what was done. I don't believe they are trying to impose restrictions with their FAQ. Rather they are indicating that certain operating specific system code is only available under a specific license. The license is just GPL for one tarball and just CDDL for the other tarball they released. It really isn't any more complex than that. -- "Less is only more where more is no good." --Frank Lloyd Wright Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
