Alan Coopersmith wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Inside Sun, there is a committee known as the
"Product Approval Committee" that has oversight
of what goes into Solaris. As this also impacts
what is putback into nevada, it has oversight of
OpenSolaris too, at present.
Is there any thought that the same will (or will not :) be
needed for OpenSolaris?
We've discussed this a few months ago, but since you're
apparently just coming to the table now with all these
questions...
I'm not sure we need a PAC per se - it's about product
definition and requirements (though perhaps Indiana will
have a PAC-like body for it).
I think you're right about this.
The individual communities should be doing the "approval" part
of "PAC" when it comes to determining what goes back and what
does not.
There will need to be some sort of release engineering team that
decides "no new projects unless authorised until the next release
is out" and so forth but that's a W-Team job.
Darren
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
