> When I come to think of it, Solaris looks ok. The > problem is that Firefox browsing doesnt look as good > as Windows Firefox (it is a distinct difference). > That is why I made this thread. My mistake, to blame > it on Solaris. Although it looks better now. Thanx > for you help. > > Actually, I feel bad on posting here. I do want you > to spend you time on improving Solaris instead of > answering my stupid questions. I will try to avoid to > post here, except in the "newbies section". > > However, I do hope that some of you make it a habit > to every once in a while, look there and answer > questions there. If no one of you looks there it is > not a fun world for the new Solaris switcher. Your > executives have spent much effort to make people > switch to Solaris, and when they do, no one is there > to make their switch easier. Then they will go back > and all executive effort, marketing, etc has been in > vain.
No problem here. I don't think anyone thinks negatively of your postings. I apologize, profusely, if you think my comments are personal. Not at all. I just don't think it is appropriate to leave an impression that Solaris looks not as good as others, as the subject heading suggests (which, if not corrected, will be quoted elsewhere as part of the FUD against Solaris). I pay particular attention to the look and feel of screen fonts (this is one of my worst pet peeves--I can't tolerate bad screen fonts). Of course, the actual font rendering also depends on the hardware (video card), video driver, font choices, etc. There is no doubt that your comments are very sincere. Indeed, I thank you for giving me an opportunity to spread words about the pleasant looks and feels of the "new" Solaris. :-) This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
