On 06/09/07, Kaiwai Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 20:13 -0700, Alan DuBoff wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, Kaiwai Gardiner wrote: > > > > > Actually, if Sun played it in such a way, Sun would look like the > > > victim, AMD would look like the irresponsible partner, and the only > > one > > > who would truly come out worse would be AMD - as AMD partners would > > > question the basis of any relationship with them. > > > > I don't know...seems that when you're playing CEO on the internet, > > you > > could toss them some chump change and open that relationship, so both > > Sun > > and AMD came out looking like heros. No? > > > > After all, it's the internet, can't we just make it end how we > > want?;-) > > Yeah, and the current situation has worked sooooooooo well so far. How > long did it take for Sun to realise that SPARC isn't the be all and end > all? when their share price plumited to 1/10th? when management finally > woke up from their opium hazed existance and realised that they alone > should have their hands on the steering wheel rather than allowing the > noisy bratts at the back to gain control?
This criticism is not helpful, on-topic, or constructive; please drop this thread. In the future, I would suggest presenting your comments in a constructive manner. Thanks, -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. " --Donald Knuth _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
