Richard L. Hamilton wrote: >> MC wrote: >> >>> Not that I care for bureaucracy, and not that I >>> >> know what is happening here, but... >> >>> I think if you strong-arm past the OpenSolaris >>> >> community bureaucracy (and again, not saying you are, >> because I don't know much about it), it'll be >> archived forever and referenced in the future to show >> how Sun only takes said OpenSolaris bureaucracy >> seriously when it is convenient for them. >> >>> >>> >>> >> Context? >> > > Where's the pointer to formal buy-in by the OGB for the use of Indiana as > _the_ OpenSolaris reference distro? > There was none. The OGB was not formally consulted. Several of us made our concerns known as individual voices, but that apparently had no effect. > Where's at least a broad _agreement_ between Sun and the OGB that > a program will be developed to (a) define what constitutes a compatible > distro, and (b) allow compatible distros to use the OpenSolaris trademark? > There is none. > Possibly not necessary to have, but certainly polite and > credibility-enhancing, > IMO. > Indeed, it would have been polite, wouldn't it.
cheers, steve -- stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.whacked.net _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
