On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Marty Duey wrote: > On 10/31/2007 2:42 PM, Ceri Davies wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 12:08:12PM -0600, Jon Trulson wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote: >>> >>> >>>> "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] >> There's your example of harm; Jon Trulson would be supporting only >> the reference distribution and not the other distros. This can be >> expected to hold true for others. [1] >> >> Ceri >> >> [1] This can, of course, be seen to be a good thing for ISVs, but that's >> not the question which was one of harm to other distros. >
> I think you're reaching. As has been stated numerous times > throughout the thread today, what end users decide to run as their > OpenSolaris-based distro will determine which distro(s) an ISV has > to support. On the other hand, if ISVs like Jon qualify a > "reference" distribution then ti should be easier to offer support > to derivative distros as well. Certainly easier than is the case in > Linux-land today. > Exactly. > Marty > -- Happy cheese in fear | Jon Trulson against oppressor, rebel! | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Brocolli, hostage. -Unknown | #include <std/disclaimer.h> _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
