Hi John, John Plocher pÃÅ¡e v Ät 01. 11. 2007 v 21:12 -0700: > Brandorr wrote: > > Now you are telling another $foo distro maker, that all the other $foo > > distro makers that they are marginal $foo players. And that only Sun > > can make a real $foo distro? > > > > Am I misinterpreting your statement? > > Yes. > > I'm trying to say: > > I am telling another $foo distro maker that all the $foo distros > are either compatible, derivative or incompatible $foo distross, > as defined by the OpenSolaris community. In addition, the OpenSolaris > community itself produces a distro that is compatible. >
Why is THE OpenSolaris distribution the most controversial, if it should be THE distribution? I'm not against Indiana, I think it is good idea and several interesting things is comming from it. Except two things: a) how it is cooperating with the community (and it is outside and inside of Sun, both sides are in same position around this cooperation...) b) if it should be the basic of OpenSolaris distro (including name of the project), it shouldn't make controversial decisions without the community These two things destroy the whole work of the Indiana group :-( They should change on of these two and the situation will be much better. Best regards, Milan
_______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
