On Feb 6, 2008 3:33 PM, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Feb 6, 2008 2:57 PM, Joerg Schilling > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > (Or you need to proof that there are no /bin/sh scripts in use on > > > > > Solaris > > > > > which execute differently under ksh/ksh93) > > > > > > > > ...ksh93 can be modified to provide backwards compatibility where > > > > possible. > > > > > > > > > This is not true, at least not if you limit the effort to reasonable > > > values... > > > > > > Your wild guess seems to be a result of not knowing why e.g. these > > > commands > > > > It isn't a wild guess. If I'm not mistaken, Roland has been doing some > > testing and work in the area of shell compatibility. > > Please read the rest of the mail you replied to and you understand why it > would > not work.....
Since you're not trying to solve the problem, but merely trying to keep the problem from trying to be solved, I have a hard time believing you. I will have to agree to disagree. -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "To err is human -- and to blame it on a computer is even more so." - Robert Orben _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
