On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:53:04 -0600 "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2008 12:42 PM, a b <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Yes, they have, and what's why it needs to be changed :) > > > > > > Oh wait...you were talking about Solaris ;) > > > > I think this is too harsh. If you were working on HP-UX, you'd find > > that the OS is even more rigid in not changing anything than > > Solaris. Solaris is almost ultra-liberal in that respect. > > Except HP-UX is dead/dormant for all practical purposes. HP is on the .........^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ That's pretty funny. Upon what facts do you base this assertion? >GNU/Linux bandwagon now. Yeah, and we see how well that's be working out for them. Hence HP-UX still powers the big enterprise stuff that matters most. The GNU/Linux stuff is more so the marketroids have that availability for clients who've got Linux stuck in their heads. -- Best regards, Ken Gunderson Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon? _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
