Lurie wrote: >> Right, as a "Solaris replacement" Indiana isn't there yet by a long shot. >> > > true. but I don't think it's because of the reasons you mentioned > > >> (It misses SPARC support, >> > > should be there within several months > > >> liveupgrade, >> > > this is superceded by zfs cloning on upgrades > > But that won't help people use live-upgrade to move to IN will it?
>> upgradability from "pre-Indiana releases" >> > > I don't think this will ever be possible ? > > Then it's not really a Solaris replacement. NV can do this. >> and has too much uncontrolled "entropy" >> (for lack of a better word) >> > > yeah, it needs time. > > > +1 > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > opensolaris-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
