> I'm going to go ahead and invoke the definition of > insanity at this > point: doing the same action multiple times and > expecting differing > results. This is the third thread you've hijacked or > actually started > about suspending in the last 24 hours. Either way, > enough is enough. > either you already have an answer or there is none. > You cannot defend > he fact that your trivial problem is in no way > deserving of three > threads, much less a single one, given that the only > point of a > [open]solaris-on-laptop is undertaken by the > awesomeness of gdamore > and possibly naturetech. While I am the first to > issue props to > gdamore and his ex-employer for solaris laptops, > realize that gdamore, > although an awesome mortal, is still a mortal. The > short answer on > suspend-on-closing of a laptop "yeah, it's being > worked on". The long > answer is that suspend itself is barely a year old in > solaris and that > it may take a bit to get to your standards. The > secondary answer to > your query is "great, it will be there as soon as you > show the code to > someone who can commit". Either sign a contributor > agreement or > convince someone who already has to audit your code, > or wait until > someone who has done the previous to commit code to > do what you wish. > That's the joy and pain of opensource: the only > person to blame for a > [lack of] feature is your own. The br'er patch is > that way, br'er > rabbit, have fun. >
...I am so sorry. I am totally new in this forum, and I feel guilty now. Thanks anyway. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
