[email protected] wrote:
>
>> CR 6248065 is quite interesting. However, some reasons from 2005 aren't
>> much applicable nowadays (system is more-or-less 64-bit-proof now).
>> And well, maybe it's not about optimization, it's more about policy for
>> using isa directories.
>
>
> In SPARC, we can really get rid of much of the isaexec dirs.
Feel free to tackle:
6226947 isaexec and the sparcv[79] binaries no longer useful on sparc
(It would even seem a reasonable starting project for a contributor wanting
to learn more about how to update the ON makefiles and package definitions,
since that should be the bulk of the changes.)
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [email protected]
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
