On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 01:21:41AM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote: > Ignacio Marambio Cat?n wrote: >> it seems like half my system was broken after this many upgrades (from >> osol beta 2 to the latest dev) > ... >> na...@saturn:/opt$ pfexec pkg fix >> [..] >> Created ZFS snapshot: 2009-04-23-04:41:23 ..... // > ... >> DOWNLOAD PKGS FILES XFER (MB) >> Completed 26/26 664/664 1.68/1.68 >> >> PHASE ACTIONS >> Update Phase 73/678 Action upgrade >> failed for 'lib/libc.so.1' (pkg:/SUNWcsl): >> OSError: [Errno 16] Device busy >> Traceback (most recent call last): > ... >> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/actions/file.py", line >> 197, in install >> portable.rename(temp, final_path) >> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/pkg/portable/os_unix.py", >> line 197, in rename >> os.rename(src, dst) >> OSError: [Errno 16] Device busy >> >> >> pkg: This is an internal error. Please let the developers know about this >> problem by filing a bug at http://defect.opensolaris.org and including the >> above traceback and this message. The version of pkg(5) is >> '05eb4fbadc69'. > > Yet more fun with libc; because of the mountpoint magic with libc, I > suspect this won't be able to proceed, and is probably incorrectly marking > the mounted libc.so as needing to be fixed. > > We have several related bugs: 529, 7721, and possibly others... > > However, I don't know if this specific case should be filed as a new bug, > or simply added as a comment to one of the above.
This is 7721. Danek
_______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
