Harry Putnam wrote:
Even more confusing when I look at /etc/release:
OpenSolaris 2009.06 snv_111b X86
Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
Assembled 07 May 2009
and a look at beadm list:
osol-110 - - 91.92M static 2009-04-05 17:09
osol-111 - - 85.92M static 2009-05-24 19:47
osol-112 NR / 11.91G static 2009-06-10 14:00
Note it says I'm running 112 [N]ow and at [R]eboot.
You are running 111b which is the most current OpenSolaris version, AFAIK.
The "beadm" output is "lying" ;)
I guess you had osol-111 or renamed your BE that way, then did a "pkg
image-update" to 111b. But "image-update" just creates a new BE called
"CurrentBE + 1" = 112. it does not mean that you are running 112.
If the next opensolaris update is snv_115 (or whatever build they use)
your BE will read "osol-113".
It would be nice if image-update created BEs with more useful names.
Same for the Grub menu. e.g. based on the release version or uname -a
output.
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
