uname doesnt report 32 bits because the output of uname is irrelevant for this this is not linux, there are no separate 64 and 32 bit versions, there is just one version, and the stuff that does not offer significant benefits compiled in 64 bit mode is left as a 32 bit application
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Husam Senussi <hu...@senussi.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have installed OpenSolaris in machine with Xeon E5450 which 64 bit, the > kernel seems to be running > as 64 bit is showing below but all the installed application are 32 bit. > > ---> CPU info > r...@core:~# psrinfo -vp > The physical processor has 4 virtual processors (0 2 4 6) > x86 (GenuineIntel 10676 family 6 model 23 step 6 clock 3000 MHz) > Intel(r) Xeon(r) CPU E5450 @ 3.00GHz > The physical processor has 4 virtual processors (1 3 5 7) > x86 (GenuineIntel 10676 family 6 model 23 step 6 clock 3000 MHz) > Intel(r) Xeon(r) CPU E5450 @ 3.00GHz > > --> Kernal info > r...@core:~# isainfo -vk > 64-bit amd64 kernel modules > > > ---> Application samples. > r...@core:~# file /usr/bin/gcc > /usr/bin/gcc: ELF 32-bit LSB executable 80386 Version 1 [FPU], dynamically > linked, stripped > > r...@core:~# file /bin/sh > /bin/sh: ELF 32-bit LSB executable 80386 Version 1 [FPU], dynamically > linked, not stripped, no debugging information available > > So my question is shouldn't the installer install 64 bit version of the > application, I also notices the uname report showing 32 bit. > > r...@core:~# uname -a > SunOS core 5.11 snv_111b i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris > > > I used this image for the installation osol-0906-x86.iso > > > Thanks > > _______________________________________________ > opensolaris-discuss mailing list > opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
