You (Martin Bochnig) wrote:
> I responded to Edward Martinez, exactly because I did not agree with
> him in that new context.
> Of course partially he is right. But it is Oracle(Management´s) very
> very own fault. The put gazoline into that fire!
> By just doing n o t h i n g.
> Didn´t I state this?
If someone DOES NOTHING, that can't be WRONG-DOING. It might be HELPING OTHERS
in wrongdoing by not PREVENTING something, but it's NOT wrong-doing.
So, YOU ALL HERE are the "wrongdoers" by calling something "dead".
You can try to blame Oracle for not calling it alive, but look:
http://c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6510-Future-of-OpenSolaris.html
Is this proof of an engagement TOWARDS OpenSolaris?
So, why all this FUD and FUSS here?
CALM DOWN! Get your senses back in order!
Matthias
--
Matthias Pfützner | Tel.: +49 700 PFUETZNER | "It's all very cool, but
Lichtenbergstr.73 | mailto:[email protected] | I wonder, what it really
D-64289 Darmstadt | AIM: pfuetz, ICQ: 300967487 | means." Anon. MIT Student
Germany | http://www.pfuetzner.de/matthias/ | in Byte's 4/96 Editorial
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
