Shawn Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > On 07/19/10 02:50 AM, [email protected] wrote: > ... > > If we add the inverted tsort algorith and a default prefix for packages > > (e.g. http://schily.net/packages) and if we combine this with ZFS, > > is there really something missing? > > For those interested in learning more about the dependency solver use by > pkg(5) (integrated in build 128), read more here: > > http://blogs.sun.com/barts/entry/satisfaction
You don't seem to know that SchilliX has no problems to resolve dependencies using tsort since several years. tsort works for linker dependencies since 30 years the only difference is that the output has to be reversed for packages. Jörg -- EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [email protected] (uni) [email protected] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
