joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
> Gabriele Bulfon <gbul...@sonicle.com> wrote:
>
>> That's great ;) and....what are the missing features compared to latest
>> OpenSolaris dev? (if any...)
>
> If you like to compare SchilliX with OpenSolaris, nothing is missing.
> If you compare SchilliX to Indiana, things look different.
>
> From the discussion of Licenses, it seems that Indiana is not made of
> redistributable code only.
The distro named "OpenSolaris", originally created by the Indiana project,
contains only redistributable code in the install media & main IPS repositories,
though some of that is closed source binaries released under licenses like
the OSBL.
All packages containing code which is not redistributable are isolated
to the /extra repository.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
