Thanks,
Dont seem very intuitive... because looking to snv_ we don't have a clue
of which release we are talking. If you look to a NVD entry I notice
that ( http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2008-5010 ),
and it is possible that Oracle/Sun made the submissions as a vendor of
the products.
There is anyway to see the releases affected in some Oracle security
advisory ?
Thanks
On 11/16/2010 05:31 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Miguel Garcia wrote:
Sorry, I'm a little bit confused now,
so
2008.05 snv_86 ( so, all snv_XX< than 86 are from 2008.05 ? this apply
to all snv and releases right ?)
All bugs fixed in snv_01...snv_86 are fixed in 2008.05.
Bugs that were reported in snv_85 or earlier may or may not affect 2008.05,
since they might have been fixed in snv_86 or might be fixed later than that
(or not yet fixed at all).
There were other releases prior to 2008.05, like Solaris Express Developer
Edition, but those are now ancient history.
2008.11 snv_101 ( 86< snv<=101 )
2009.06 snv_111 (101< snv<=111)
2010.11 snv_151 => Solaris 11 Express, as Ken Mays said, so 2009.06 was
Oracle Solaris 10? At least should be because what you said.
No, Oracle Solaris 10 is a different product line. "snv" is short for
"Solaris Nevada", the code name for the OS product line based on the 5.11
kernel. Solaris 10 is the product line based on the 5.10 kernel.
--
Miguel Garcia
http://homepages.lasige.di.fc.ul.pt/~mhenriques
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
