> Dunc wrote:

> ----------------  lwp# 4 / thread# 4  --------------------
> feef1777 readlink (fe76d23c, fe76d63c, fe76ce38, 805a55d) + 7
> 0805a77d devfsadm_mklink (fe76ddac, 818c898,  81a9210, 0) + 231
> fd67097a zfs      (81a9210, 818c898, 80a9fa8, 81a9240) + 17e
> 0805964a minor_process (818c898, 81a9210, fe76e314, 805939e) + 13e
> 080594c3 check_minor_type (818c898, 81a9210, fe76e89c, febdbe6a) + 133
> febdbf27 walk_one_minor_list (fe76e2c8, 0, 10, fe76e89c, 8059390, ef7f000) + 
> cb
> febdc000 di_walk_minor (816b058, 0, 10, fe76e89c, 8059390, 807d52c) + 90
> 08057b89 devi_tree_walk (fe76e89c, df07, 0, 8058736) + 10d
> 08058749 sync_handler (0, fe76e8ec, 514, 0, 0, 80586ac) + 9d
> feef1ff2 __door_return () + 52

lwp #4 in devfsadm seems to be busy;
I suspect this thread is consuming (all?) the cpu time.

A "prstat -L" will show which process threads consume cpu time.
Does devfsadm/4 (lwp#4 in process devfsadm)  consume all of
devfsadm's cpu time?

What system call activity is reported by "truss -l -v all -p `pgrep -x devfsadm 
`" ?
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org

Reply via email to