On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Greg Palmer <GregoryLPalmer at netscape.net>wrote:
> Alastair Neil wrote: > >> Well I did not choose anything it was installed this way - this should >> therefore be filed as a bug no? >> >> Hi Alistair, > > It's an interesting philosophical question. It's pointed to the same place > it will be when it is released for Production. As an engineer I like that > since there is one less thing to forget when release time comes around. > > There are a number of features like this which might bear the 2009.05 > imprint even though the release isn't 2009.05. I suppose it depends on how > it was marketed to you, since it was apparently sold as a preview, I would > think a mention in the release notes would be the correct course of action. > If there isn't one there then I'd file an enhancement request at least. > > Regards, > Greg Yes I believe you are correct, and in fact I confess I did not read the release notes carefully, so it may be that it is mentioned - in which case colour me embarrassed. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-help/attachments/20090217/7899e792/attachment.html>
