Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Michael Disserman wrote:
>> Can someone please explain me an update policy for OpenSolaris release 
>> builds.
>>
>> In example, I've tested 2009.6 in the test environment and can install it in 
>> the production but I'm afraid of the bug # 6882364 (networking wedged up 
>> behind blocked taskq_thread() in Xen Dom0).
>>
>> This bug has a state "10-Fix Delivered:Verified (Fix available in build)" 
>> but where to get the update? Of course I don't want to switch to the 
>> development branch. As well as don't want to wait 6 months to get a release 
>> build with the bug fixed.
>>
>> Does someone provide a bugfix patches for the release versions? Maybe there 
>> is some commercial support for this? I've found commercial opensolaris 
>> support offers on sun.com however there's a note the patch could be 
>> available within a 6 months, which's actually a period when stable branches 
>> of osol are released. I've tried to talk with Sun support in webchat, they 
>> don't know anything except a phone numbers. Support on the phone don't know 
>> the details, they can just read for you an info from the public website.
> 
> 2009.06 was built from snv_111 - since that bug fix is delivered in snv_125,
> it came after the 2009.06 release.   As you've already discovered, you can
> get it for free by updating to the development branch builds (which are
> currently up to snv_129).   Sun's commercial support does offer bug fix
> releases for 2009.06 - I'm not sure why the web page indicates 6 months
> for fixes, when currently updates are released approximately monthly.   While
> this fix isn't currently in a Support Repository Update (SRU), I believe
> if you have bought a support contract you can request to escalate the fix
> into an SRU - they usually include all security fixes by default, and then
> any other fixes that customers have escalated or support deems critical to
> include.   You can see the current lists of available updates at:
>       http://sunsolve.sun.com/show.do?target=opensolaris

If I had to guess, I'd say that the six months bit was about new major 
releases and not updates for a specific release.  I've poked Glynn 
Foster about this.

-- 
Shawn Walker

Reply via email to