> I keep posting info here because I have posted this > as a bug twice, but when I search the bug database it > cannot be found. Hence I cannot add any information > to it. The bug reporting system is a extremely poor > compared to bugzilla. But hey, Solaris is good, but > has still a lot to catch up to get to Linux's ease of > use and tools (bugzilla) to make it easier to use. > > I hope that some of the developers will pick this up > to work on this issue. I give up posting any further > bugs (and after this also considering Solaris on x86 > for production). > > Some more debugging output: > > from a cat * inside > /opt/SUNWexplo/output/explorer.3160b33d.mars-2007.12.1 > 6.15.35/disks, here the most relevant info found: > > Pos Port_ID Hard_Addr Port WWN Node WWN > Type > 0 50020f2300006d0f 50020f2000006d0f 0x0 > (Disk device) > 1 0 210000e08b022f63 200000e08b022f63 > 0x1f (Unknown Type,Host Bus Adapter) > > Link Error Status information for > loop:/devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/pci1022,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pci1011,[EMAIL > PROTECTED]/pci1 > 077,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:devctl > al_pa lnk fail sync loss signal loss > sequence err invalid word CRC > 31 12 12 0 > 0 0 > 1 1 0 0 > 0 > ESB counts are not cleared by a reset, only power > cycles. > These counts must be compared to previously read > counts. > > Futher probing commands: > > bash-3.2# luxadm -e port > /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/pci1022,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pci1011,[EMAIL > PROTECTED]/pci1077,2 > @4/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:devctl CONNECTED > /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/pci1022,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pci1011,[EMAIL > PROTECTED]/pci1077,2 > @5/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:devctl NOT CONNECTED > bash-3.2# luxadm -e dump_map > /devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/pci1022,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pci1011,[EMAIL > PROTECTED]/pci1077,2 > @4/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:devctl > Pos Port_ID Hard_Addr Port WWN Node WWN > Type > 0 50020f2300006d0f 50020f2000006d0f 0x0 > (Disk device) > 1 0 210000e08b022f63 200000e08b022f63 > 0x1f (Unknown Type,Host Bus Adapter) > > bash-3.2# fcinfo hba-port -l > HBA Port WWN: 210000e08b022f63 > OS Device Name: /dev/cfg/c4 > Manufacturer: QLogic Corp. > Model: QLA2200 > Firmware Version: 2.1.145 > FCode/BIOS Version: BIOS: 1.76; > Type: L-port > State: online > Supported Speeds: 1Gb > Current Speed: 1Gb > Node WWN: 200000e08b022f63 > Error: SendRLS failed for 210000e08b022f63 > HBA Port WWN: 210000e08b022f63 > OS Device Name: /dev/cfg/c5 > Manufacturer: QLogic Corp. > Model: QLA2200 > Firmware Version: 2.1.145 > FCode/BIOS Version: BIOS: 1.76; > Type: unknown > State: offline > Supported Speeds: 1Gb > Current Speed: not established > Node WWN: 200000e08b022f63 > Link Error Statistics: > Link Failure Count: 0 > Loss of Sync Count: 0 > Loss of Signal Count: 0 > Primitive Seq Protocol Error Count: 0 > Invalid Tx Word Count: 0 > Invalid CRC Count: 0 > installed also QLogic's scli. > > Running it just hangs as any other operation (mount, > format, zpool import) that tries to access the > disks: > > bash-3.2# scli > Searching for QLogic FC HBA(s) and attached device(s) > .... (waited for 20 minutes ... did not get any > further than the rolling slash)
That is a good question is the BUGID/RFE http://www.opensolaris.org/bug/report.jspa not working again! It would be nice if someone could modify the the jsp/servlet to email the submitter back what was posted? or pleace it in a viewable forum called submitted BUG/ID & RFE's. also a to make is searchable the BUGID/RFE should incluse a hostid to allow a search sunce email seem to be a sensifive issue for public access. Also bug issues should be in the BUG forum vs the help, maybe that site monitor could help! But back you your issue, in defense to Solaris code vs vender supplied microcode issue that you seem to have, open a Qlogic ticket and resubmit a BUGID/RFE with that info and let the bug forum know as well to keep every one posted. This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-help mailing list [email protected]
