Using 2008.11 and AVS I'm getting the following error when trying to run 
"sndradm -g primary -nu" on my primary server --

sndradm: warning: SNDR: Could not open file 
<slaveservername>:/dev/rdsk/c3t3d0s0 on remote node

First of all, I've done this many times on 2008.05 without problem.  Secondly, 
I understand the packaging problems with 2008.11 and AVS so I followed the 
steps recommended here - 
http://www.mail-archive.com/storage-disc...@opensolaris.org/msg05345.html, 
namely to install AVS like so:

pkg install SUNWscm
pkg install SUNWspsv
pkg install SUNWrdc
pkg install SUNWii

Then I run dscfgadm, which works, but of course dscfgadm -i does not.  The 
script has an error, so I followed the suggestion here - 
http://www.mail-archive.com/storage-disc...@opensolaris.org/msg04676.html, 
namely to modify the /usr/sbin/dscfgadm ksh script on line 1020 and change:

typeset svc=$1

to

typeset svc='$1'

After all that, I get the following result from dscfgadm -i

SERVICE         STATE           ENABLED
nws_scm         online          true
nws_sv          online          true
nws_ii          online          true
nws_rdc         online          true
nws_rdcsyncd    online          true

Availability Suite Configuration:
Local configuration database: valid

I ran an identical sndradm command on both the primary and the secondary (the 
same way I've done it in 2008.05) :

sndradm -ne <primaryservername> /dev/rdsk/c3t3d0s0 /dev/rdsk/c3t3d0s1 
<secondaryservername> /dev/rdsk/c3t3d0s0 /dev/rdsk/c3t3d0s1 ip sync g primary

I also have both host names in /etc/hosts on both servers.

So everything looks good, but I still get the "could not open file on remote 
node" error mentioned above.

Lastly, for anyone wondering why I'm so interested in doing this on 2008.11, I 
can't use any other version for the following reasons --

2008.05 - doesn't have the zfs_write_limit_override setting.  Absolutely 
required in my scenario, otherwise ZFS batches up writes in a way that results 
in poor perceived performance of my application (stuttering).  See:

http://www.mail-archive.com/zfs-disc...@opensolaris.org/msg28704.html
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=119421
http://www.mail-archive.com/zfs-disc...@opensolaris.org/msg26672.html.

2009.06 - hangs on large zfs send/recv jobs.  I use daily snapshots, and when 
this doesn't work properly, I can't back up.  See:

https://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=384540
http://www.mail-archive.com/zfs-discuss at opensolaris dot org/msg34493.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/zfs-discuss at opensolaris dot org/msg37158.html

Build 134b - We're not NASA, but we're not in a van down by the river either.  
I know OpenSolaris is probably not considered production worthy for large 
corporations (they're supposed to get REAL Solaris or just play around with 
OpenSolaris I guess), probably in the same way that in the Linux world CentOS 
and Fedora aren't "production worthy" for the same type of organization, but it 
works fine for us.  That being said, we're big enough to not feel comfortable 
using a development build for our server.  Even if it's better/stabler/whatever 
than the other versions, it's a bit too unprofessional and I simply won't get 
away with it (especially if something went wrong - "What? It's a beta 
version?").  If Oracle won't call it a "release" for whatever reason, I can't 
use it like one.

2010.XX - Can't wait, I need to build a server sometime before the end of the 
Obama administration.

So I'm pretty much forced into 2008.11.  I hope I don't have to add 2008.11 to 
my list of versions I can't use, since there aren't any left!

Thanks in advance for any suggestions!
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-help mailing list
opensolaris-help@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to