Hi folks: Not ready yet!
On Feb 17, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Maya Remblai <snowfox...@dragonkeepcreations.com > wrote: > Tillie Ariantho wrote: >> On 17.02.2010 21:25, Maggie Leber (sl: Maggie Darwin) wrote: >> >> >>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Robert Martin >>> <robertl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> ive noticed that there is a link on the secondlife.com dashboard to >>>> download sl 2.0 (with a target of http://secondlife.com/beta-viewer/ >>>> ) >>>> is this a case of released to soon or what?? >>>> >>> Your question cannot be answered unless you sign an NDA. :-) >>> >> >> I'll sign an NDA happily if I get an answer for that and get a >> working download link for the 2.0 beta. ;-D >> >> Tillie >> > I think pretty much everybody on this group would. At any rate, if > they > released 2.0 today it wouldn't be "early," it would be "on time." Blog > posts pointed to a February release. > > Also, technically it would be the BSI group that would be more > likely to > know this kind of thing, being the designated alpha testing group. > (They > weren't used for 2.0's alpha though, and the group has been silent for > months, so I don't blame you. ;) ) > > ~Maya Remblai, still a bit pessimistic. > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
