Latif Khalifa wrote: > It also means that now I need to hire a lawyer in order to continue to > make and distribute my text viewer (Radegast), with special features > aimed at people with disabilities. The terms mandate that I need to > have an official privacy policy published, and I also need to to show > SL ToS to users (and I have no idea where would I get it, and how to > tell if it's updated). "Shared experience" clause doesn't even deserve > spending time on it. >
If a media plugin provides collaboration between participating viewers and doesn't update the sim, or only updates the sim with a view-only version of what people are working on, does this violate the "shared experience" clause? What about musicians sharing sound data between themselves via client plugins and doing mixing before uploading the sound to the sim? And what about the VWRAP proposal to let clients establish connections for external services via capabilities? Such a capability could easily violate the new policy. Lots of vague stuff in this policy. L. > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Gigs <gigstagg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> http://secondlife.com/corporate/tpv.php >> >> You all realize this is massively incompatible with the GPL, right? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: >> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev >> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting >> privileges >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges > > _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
