So you've created this Third Party Viewer Directory in order to *promote* third part viewers? *That's* your "why"? Well, you needn't have bothered. You did much more to promote third party viewers by releasing Viewer 2.0.
Mike Soft Linden wrote: > I feel I should add too - this isn't all stick, as my below > speculation about legal's intent might have suggested. Remember that > we're creating the Viewer Directory to promote other viewer projects, > so complying with the TPV terms offers up a pretty good carrot. > However, I think legal also knows we'd be making trouble for ourselves > if we gave even the whiff of an endorsement to a tool that hurt our > resis or the Lab. So, legal needed to offer some objective rules > before we could promote any projects. > > I hope this is helping. I worried that one of the most frustrating > parts of the TPV might be that it was landing with a big "what" > without enough "why" behind it. Most people react pretty badly to > anything that looks like control for control's own sake. _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
