Back in the old days of Philip's SL, Lindens often proclaimed the futility of entering an arms race, and the channel concept stems from that --- self-identification as a choice, in the knowledge that stronger measures will always be countered anyway. It seems that those days are long gone though.
Anyone wanting a solid business for the next few years might consider selling brooms to SL protectionists. There's a lot of tide to sweep back. ;-) Morgaine. =================================== On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Maggie Leber (sl: Maggie Darwin) < mag...@matrisync.com> wrote: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Maggie Leber (sl: Maggie Darwin) <mag...@matrisync.com> > Date: Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:04 PM > Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] FAQ posted for Third Party Viewer Policy > To: Tigro Spottystripes <tigrospottystri...@gmail.com> > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Tigro Spottystripes > <tigrospottystri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > An user agent string for the client would indeed be useful, but would be > > useless to catch all but the lamest malicious clients. > > Well, I though that's what the required "unique channel" is for. > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges >
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
