Who is going to reject a contribution to snowglobe? Ok... some can write a technically perfect patch, but with an impact that nobody wants, that's a fact (think about 2.0). So there has to be line: at some point it has to be decided if a patch should be accepted; but how does that work?
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 01:20:44PM -0500, Mike Monkowski wrote: > Except for Merov's contributions, I don't think Snowglobe ever had a > planned direction. The direction was just the sum of the contributions > people made to it. And I expect it will continue that way. If someone > thinks that chat needs to be fixed and they have the time to fix it, > then they probably will. The real question is whether such a > contribution would be accepted. I happen to think it would be dangerous > to reject such a contribution. > > Mike -- Carlo Wood <ca...@alinoe.com> _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
