You missed the point of my response to Soft then, Mike. Soft complained that she didn't know the details of Firefly and that *WE*(all of us here, including yourself) were not using well backed positions, and asked for details of our discussions with Q. I've now supplied the details of the only informative OH we've had on the subject, to show that what we've been discussing since February was very well founded in the information we have available to us. And that discussion was objective and technical, although limited through lack of information and response from Lindens.
I agree entirely with your suggestion that this be developed incrementally in concert with the opensource-dev community, because, after all, we are going to be affected massively by it. Unfortunately it's an internal Linden project and so we will have no say on the most fundamental features of its implementation and the requirements that it fulfills --- it will be a fait accompli when it suddenly appears. And that's the problem. Morgaine.
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
