Developers reply to LL if their code is malicious, not if a user mod
the viewer code and violate tos/cs....
11/12 mean developer don't write intentionally bad code...
--
Sent by iPhone
Il giorno 30/mar/2010, alle ore 15.13, Marine Kelley <marinekel...@gmail.com
> ha scritto:
Naturally but do they apply to the developer ? They should void only
for the original dev who implemented the feature intentionally, if
any. Keeping in mind that the servers are as responsible to protect
the data add the viewers are responsible to not attack them. To me
developers (paid by LL as well as open source therefore unpaid) should
be innocent until proven guilty. That's the only way to keep a sane
relationship.
On 30 mars 2010, at 14:52, Simon Disk <simon.dis...@gmail.com> wrote:
I think I have read a different TPV policy than most people here. I
do not see how clauses 11 and 12 are being overridden. Both clauses
stipulate that the GPL cannot be used to violate the law. So when
you use a TPV and connect to the SL grid and then steal content that
you did not create or disrupt Linden Lab's service, those clauses no
longer apply to you.
_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
privileges
_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
privileges
_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
