It's already reached a point where LL has told us, to our faces, that they are not going to change the policy, meaning our opinion doesn't mean diddly to them. There's no use continuing to discussion, just as there's no use continuing TPV development.
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 07:52 -0500, Jonathan Irvin wrote: > To Whom It May Concern: > > I'm requesting Linden Lab's response to this inquiry due to the recent > influx of new topic related...or should I say unrelated to the > development of the SnowGlobe viewer. Lately, when I open my email, I > get 5-10 different topics and responses daily to the recent changes > for the Third Party Viewer policy and I feel that this is not related > to SnowGlobe or related development at all. > > To "clear the pipes", can we please move these discussions to a > different forum or list so valid OpenSource development questions are > not lost in the flames, complaints, and discussions related to this > specific topic? > > I do not feel it is valid in this forum to talk about which > Third-Party Viewers in the directory were already impersonated or > which part of the third party viewer policy they do not like. > > Linden Labs, if you can please isolate this to another forum, I bet > those who are truly interested in the opensource development of the > Second Life viewer would be more in tuned to staying here rather than > wake up to read yet another unproductive "I hate LL and the TPVP lets > get together and share our misery post". > > Respectfully & Best Regards, > > Jonathan Irvin > SL Resident of 5 Years. > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
