On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:57 AM, miss c <miss_c...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Would it be a plausible feature in the future to have the code accept third > party plug-ins instead of creating whole new viewers? > +1 How workable is the 2.x codebase to some sort of modularity, to allow plugins, a la chrome/safari/firefox? The problem with the SL viewer being a huge monolithic client is that it becomes something that does more, on fewer machines, due to memory footprint and increasing resource consumption. If the current codebase isnt workable towards allowing plugins, it may be time to put on the brakes and consider the course. -- Daniel Smith - Sonoma County, California http://daniel.org/resume
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
