I'm certainly not a detractor of the Imprudence project, actually I'm a contributor, but at least on my platform, it's significantly less stable than any other viewer I have installed.
Granted, I don't use Kirsten's simply due to a politican disagreement in the past. ~T On 18/10/2010 18:13, Dale Innis wrote: > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Thomas Grimshaw<t...@streamsense.net> > wrote: >> Imprudence is certainly not stable enough for a viewer targeted at >> builders. >> >> ~Tom > Imprudence is no less stable than any other viewer (TP or LL). Every > viewer has its fans and its detractors, based I think mostly on what > happens to work best on the individual machine. (For instance I have > had zero stability problems with Imprudence, including for building, > but have never been able to get Kirsten's to work for me usably at > all; I imagine there are others with just the opposite experience.) > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
