does this mean that if i move all of my own code over to a dll file that is loaded at runtime that i do not have to release the source for it?
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:17:01 -0400, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) <o...@lindenlab.com> wrote: > On 2010-10-23 7:27, Carlo Wood wrote: >> I am not a lawyer :p, but I think that it is allowed to link an LGPL-ed >> library statically against a proprietary executable provided you >> provide the object code or source code of the work that uses the >> library. > > Not correct. LGPL code may be linked to other source without having the > viral effect of requiring that other source also be published as open > source. LGPL _does_ require that if any changes are made to the source > under that license, then those changes (and the original sources) must > be open and available either as LGPL or as GPL. > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
