----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/127/#review265 -----------------------------------------------------------
autobuild/common.py <http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/127/#comment198> Why send out a warning at this point? Developers who will never use scp don't benefit from this message. If scp is needed and is not present having the error sent out later should be sufficient. - Jonathan On Jan. 28, 2011, 5:20 a.m., Oz Linden wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/127/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 28, 2011, 5:20 a.m.) > > > Review request for Viewer. > > > Summary > ------- > > During initialization, if there is no scp or pscp command found then > autobuild fails immediately. This is true whether or not any scp urls need > to be used. > > This change modifies the behavior so that a warning is printed if no command > is found, but execution proceeds until an scp command is needed, at which > time execution fails with an explanatory message. > > This patch can print the warning multiple times - I didn't attempt to > suppress the extras. > > > Diffs > ----- > > autobuild/common.py f49808fe3c07 > > Diff: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/127/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > I've tested this locally, simulating the error by temporarily modifying the > names of the commands to be found for scp. > > I have not checked it on Windows, where the original problem was found. > > > Thanks, > > Oz > >
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
