-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I believe versioning numbers would go from 2.9 to 2.10 instead of 3.0
I think SL has used the non-decimal numerical school of thought for versioning on the viewers, like with Viewer 1 On 3/4/2011 6:45 AM, Trilo Byte wrote: > I understand the rationale behind dialing back the version numbering to 2.5.1 > (it put the viewer on a path towards 3.0 much sooner than may have been > desired), but seeing as 2.5.1 was given an official release yesterday > shouldn't the development snapshots be on 2.5.2 to avoid confusion? > > TriloByte Zanzibar > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNcUJQAAoJEIdLfPRu7qE2PvUH/3ClfHAFpBjKR8rMAxQjiC7w dB7F7iWdi+ASU/LvtWf6VCEyI9WxYH01CqdkwFSttvRSqLepligPnWeepSxF1GWi lk0XUJkFPcR7IvjznVOlP2gJ35z4LXPzNqSaX2+E4TWeMXxiM/JgfqzSZOm2SsJd AnQ41r2KRAIdQLuA8uU9OMPrkQUUTbos2azmc1omnEV8ELJZm6lShbUIYKzQueiG 3t0MoATKq97hWLV/0oG5jIgjmWdIEhIY7hNfdERHU4d62AMPGG113SKUeLeRjOlx apD2//4sIQSpqxYpA68123E6f6IgC2F2EYhR6o1TThIhVDGuzd8exLfmD/uS/K4= =9DCZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
